Benjamin P. Smith

10 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Benjamin P. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Aging 25
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 236
  • Insect Science 149
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 219
  • Genetics 252
Replace Fei Peng with:
Fei Peng China
Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya United States
Matthias Siebert Germany
Daniel Münch Germany
Katharina Eichler United States
Meng-Fu Maxwell Shih United States
Arian R. Jamasb United Kingdom
Stephan Knapek Germany
Gautam Reddy United States
Thiago Mosqueiro United States
Benjamin P. Smith relative to Fei Peng China Fei Peng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Fei Peng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin P. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin P. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin P. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin P. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin P. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin P. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin P. Smith. The network helps show where Benjamin P. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin P. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin P. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin P. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2011239
2 2007235
3 200591
4 200660
5 201652
6 201250
7 201049
8 200731
9 20103
10 20121

About Benjamin P. Smith

Benjamin P. Smith is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 811 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Network Technologies (4 papers), Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (3 papers), Error Correcting Code Techniques (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (25 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (236 citations), Insect Science (149 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (219 citations) and Genetics (252 citations). Benjamin P. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Frank R. Kschischang, Joel D. Levine, J. Lodge, Leslie C. Griffith, Aki Ejima, Andrew J. Hunt, Christophe Lucas, Carson J. Miller, John R. Carlson and Wynand van der Goes van Naters. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Lightwave Technology, CHEST Journal, Genetics and Heart Failure Clinics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact