Benjamin J. Coe

6.6k citations
131 papers · 6.2k · h-index 43

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin J. Coe

129 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Peers

Benjamin J. Coe
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 3.6k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 902
  • Inorganic Chemistry 1.2k
  • Organic Chemistry 1.9k
  • Materials Chemistry 3.0k
Replace Santo Di Bella with:
Santo Di Bella Italy
Hubert Le Bozec France
Gianluca Accorsi Italy
Garry S. Hanan Canada
Narcis Avarvari France
Katja Heinze Germany
Simon J. A. Pope United Kingdom
Yasutaka Kitagawa Japan
Elena Cariati Italy
Vincent M. Miskowski United States
Benjamin J. Coe relative to Santo Di Bella Italy Santo Di Bella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Santo Di Bella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin J. Coe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin J. Coe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin J. Coe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin J. Coe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin J. Coe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin J. Coe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin J. Coe. The network helps show where Benjamin J. Coe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin J. Coe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin J. Coe Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin J. Coe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000499
2 2006389
3 1999302
4 1999269
5 2002210
6 2004206
7 2003161
8 2004141
9 2002127
10 2005126
11 2008126
12 2003124
13 2005123
14 2006114
15 1995104
16 201094
17 200494
18 201293
19 199490
20 199585

About Benjamin J. Coe

Benjamin J. Coe is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Oncology, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 131 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (72 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (55 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (35 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (25 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (21 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (18 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (16 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (3.6k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (902 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (1.2k citations), Organic Chemistry (1.9k citations) and Materials Chemistry (3.0k citations). Benjamin J. Coe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Koen Clays, Inge Asselberghs, Bruce S. Brunschwig, J. Arthur Harris, André Persoons, Stephan Houbrechts, Thomas J. Meyer, Javier Garı́n, J. Orduna and Michael B. Hursthouse. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Polyhedron, Organometallics and Dalton Transactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact