Benjamin Illingworth
Impact in
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Papers in
- Surgery 1
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery 1
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 1
- Co-authors
- James MN Duffy (3 shared papers)James Rucker (1 shared paper)Luke A. Jelen (1 shared paper)Jonathan P. Roiser (1 shared paper)Marc Guitart‐Masip (1 shared paper)Rick A. Adams (1 shared paper)Matthew M. Nour (1 shared paper)Karl Friston (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Psychopharmacology (1 paper)The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (1 paper)Cerebral Cortex (1 paper)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Illingworth
4 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Toxicology 5
- Clinical Psychology 28
- Pharmacology 15
- Cognitive Neuroscience 13
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Illingworth
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Illingworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Illingworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Illingworth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Illingworth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Illingworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Illingworth. The network helps show where Benjamin Illingworth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Illingworth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 1 |
About Benjamin Illingworth
Benjamin Illingworth is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 4 papers that have together received 53 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (1 paper), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (1 paper), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (5 citations), Clinical Psychology (28 citations), Pharmacology (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (13 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (7 citations). Benjamin Illingworth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include James MN Duffy, James Rucker, Luke A. Jelen, Jonathan P. Roiser, Marc Guitart‐Masip, Rick A. Adams, Matthew M. Nour, Karl Friston, Oliver Howes and Lieke de Boer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychopharmacology, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Cerebral Cortex and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.