Benjamin Heidt

563 citations
16 papers · 414 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection 4
    • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 3
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation 3
    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications 2
    • Analytical chemistry methods development 7

Benjamin Heidt

16 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Benjamin Heidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Analytical Chemistry 121
  • Bioengineering 35
  • Biomedical Engineering 213
  • Toxicology 14
  • Electrochemistry 18
Replace Peter Cornelis with:
Peter Cornelis Belgium
Roberta D’Aurelio United Kingdom
Manlio Caldara Netherlands
Wenjuan Xu China
Jin Chul Yang South Korea
Muqsit Pirzada Germany
Hazim F. EL-Sharif United Kingdom
Patrycja Lach Poland
Т. Н. Ермолаева Russia
Jaroslava Bezděková Czechia
Benjamin Heidt relative to Peter Cornelis Belgium Peter Cornelis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Peter Cornelis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Heidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Heidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Heidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Heidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Heidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Heidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Heidt. The network helps show where Benjamin Heidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Heidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Heidt Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Heidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2020152
2 202152
3 202140
4 201928
5 201823
6 202022
7 202022
8 201816
9 202011
10 202010
11 20249
12 20198
13 20217
14 20195
15 20235
16 20244

About Benjamin Heidt

Benjamin Heidt is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Analytical Chemistry, Toxicology, Spectroscopy and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical chemistry methods development (7 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (2 papers) and Vitamin K Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (121 citations), Bioengineering (35 citations), Biomedical Engineering (213 citations), Toxicology (14 citations) and Electrochemistry (18 citations). Benjamin Heidt has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Bart van Grinsven, Thomas J. Cleij, Kasper Eersels, Hanne Diliën, Joseph W. Lowdon, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Manlio Caldara, Kathia L. Jiménez-Monroy, Erik Steen Redeker and Marloes Peeters. Their work appears in journals such as physica status solidi (a), Biosensors, Cell Reports Physical Science, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical and Nanoscale.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact