Benjamin Gess

33 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Benjamin Gess
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Finance 288
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 369
  • Applied Mathematics 177
  • Mathematical Physics 138
  • Control and Systems Engineering 320
Replace Erika Hausenblas with:
Erika Hausenblas Austria
Abdelaziz Rhandi Italy
Hakima Bessaih United States
Annie Millet France
Renhai Wang China
Peter Kotelenez United States
András Bátkai Hungary
David Elworthy United Kingdom
Giorgio Metafune Italy
David Cheban Moldova
Benjamin Gess relative to Erika Hausenblas Austria Erika Hausenblas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Erika Hausenblas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Gess

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Gess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Gess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Gess more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Gess

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Gess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Gess. The network helps show where Benjamin Gess may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Gess, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Gess Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Gess links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201197
2 201354
3 201352
4 201044
5 201630
6 201928
7 201923
8 201621
9 201320
10 201717
11 201816
12 201416
13 201815
14 201515
15 201512
16 202011
17 201210
18 201610
19 201810
20 201310

About Benjamin Gess

Benjamin Gess is a scholar working on Finance, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and financial applications (26 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (22 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (14 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (5 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (5 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (5 papers), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (4 papers) and Navier-Stokes equation solutions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (288 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (369 citations), Applied Mathematics (177 citations), Mathematical Physics (138 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (320 citations). Benjamin Gess has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Röckner, Wei Liu, Paul Lescot, Wolf‐Jürgen Beyn, Panagiotis E. Souganidis, Franco Flandoli, Michael Scheutzow, Archil Gulisashvili, Peter K. Friz and Eitan Tadmor. Their work appears in journals such as Probability Theory and Related Fields, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Journal of Differential Equations, The Annals of Probability and Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact