Benjamin Böhm

4.5k citations
160 papers · 3.6k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Böhm

147 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Benjamin Böhm
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 1.9k
  • Computational Mechanics 2.9k
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 499
  • Aerospace Engineering 854
  • Automotive Engineering 225
Replace Friedrich Dinkelacker with:
Friedrich Dinkelacker Germany
Hong G. Im Saudi Arabia
Robert L. Gordon Australia
Xiao-Jun Gu United Kingdom
Denis Veynante France
Xuesong Li China
David L. S. Hung China
David R. Noble United States
David P. Schmidt United States
Swarnendu Sen India
Benjamin Böhm relative to Friedrich Dinkelacker Germany Friedrich Dinkelacker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Friedrich Dinkelacker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Böhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Böhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Böhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Böhm. The network helps show where Benjamin Böhm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Böhm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Böhm Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Böhm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 160 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014174
2 2013124
3 200996
4 201287
5 200885
6 201482
7 201781
8 201270
9 201067
10 200865
11 201660
12 201660
13 201658
14 201357
15 201654
16 202251
17 201551
18 202150
19 201249
20 201848

About Benjamin Böhm

Benjamin Böhm is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 160 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (124 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (82 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (21 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (19 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (17 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (17 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (14 papers) and Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (1.9k citations), Computational Mechanics (2.9k citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (499 citations), Aerospace Engineering (854 citations) and Automotive Engineering (225 citations). Benjamin Böhm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Dreizler, Brian Peterson, Elias Baum, Tao Li, Christopher Jainski, Christian Krüger, C. Heeger, Carl-Philipp Ding, Wolfgang Meier and Jan Köser. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Flow Turbulence and Combustion, International Journal of Engine Research, Fuel and Experiments in Fluids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact