Benjamin Böhm

4.8k citations
170 papers · 3.9k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Böhm

157 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Benjamin Böhm
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 1.6k
  • Computational Mechanics 2.2k
  • Mechanical Engineering 578
  • Mechanics of Materials 208
  • Spectroscopy 135
Replace J.A. van Oijen with:
J.A. van Oijen Netherlands
Xuesong Li China
Suresh K. Aggarwal United States
Lyle M. Pickett United States
Taku Kudo Japan
Andreas Kronenburg Germany
Nilanjan Chakraborty United Kingdom
Cyril Crua United Kingdom
Ming‐Chia Lai United States
Yingchun Wu China
Benjamin Böhm relative to J.A. van Oijen Netherlands J.A. van Oijen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
J.A. van Oijen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Böhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Böhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Böhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Böhm. The network helps show where Benjamin Böhm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Böhm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Böhm Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Böhm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 170 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014184
2 2013125
3 200995
4 201287
5 201486
6 200885
7 201782
8 201269
9 201068
10 200865
11 201660
12 201660
13 201660
14 201359
15 202256
16 200755
17 201654
18 201551
19 202151
20 201249

About Benjamin Böhm

Benjamin Böhm is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Ocean Engineering, having authored 170 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (83 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (80 papers), Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing (31 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (30 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (7 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (6 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (5 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (1.6k citations), Computational Mechanics (2.2k citations), Mechanical Engineering (578 citations), Mechanics of Materials (208 citations) and Spectroscopy (135 citations). Benjamin Böhm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Dreizler, Brian Peterson, Elias Baum, Tao Li, Carl-Philipp Ding, Christopher Jainski, Christian Krüger, C. Heeger, Isaac G. Boxx and Wolfgang Meier. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Flow Turbulence and Combustion, Fuel, Experiments in Fluids and Combustion and Flame.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact