Bénédicte Condamine

18 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Bénédicte Condamine
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Endocrinology 212
  • Molecular Medicine 186
  • Food Science 87
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 7
  • Pollution 43
Replace Jeannette Muñoz-Aguayo with:
Jeannette Muñoz-Aguayo United States
Belinda Vangchhia Australia
Saskia-Camille Flament-Simon Spain
Patricia Lozano-Zaraín Mexico
Susana Viso Spain
Claire de Curraize France
Jörg Weinreich Germany
Elisabet Guiral Spain
Razib Mazumder Bangladesh
Bénédicte Condamine relative to Jeannette Muñoz-Aguayo United States Jeannette Muñoz-Aguayo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jeannette Muñoz-Aguayo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bénédicte Condamine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bénédicte Condamine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bénédicte Condamine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bénédicte Condamine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bénédicte Condamine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bénédicte Condamine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bénédicte Condamine. The network helps show where Bénédicte Condamine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bénédicte Condamine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bénédicte Condamine Line = papers co-authored together Bénédicte Condamine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2019192
2 202141
3 202129
4 202324
5 202220
6 202317
7 202414
8 202213
9 201912
10 20218
11 20218
12 20217
13 20247
14 20247
15 20235
16 20242
17 20252
18 20232
19 20260

About Bénédicte Condamine

Bénédicte Condamine is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Endocrinology, Microbiology, Food Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (13 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (9 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers) and Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (212 citations), Molecular Medicine (186 citations), Food Science (87 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (7 citations) and Pollution (43 citations). Bénédicte Condamine has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Érick Denamur, Olivier Clermont, Sara Dion, David M. Gordon, Antoine Bridier‐Nahmias, Belinda Vangchhia, Guilhem Royer, Victoire de Lastours, Agnès Lefort and Marco Galardini. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, PLoS Genetics, Environmental Microbiology, mBio and The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact