Ben Smith

2.4k citations
39 papers · 1.7k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Ben Smith

38 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Ben Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 678
  • Software 161
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 360
  • Clinical Psychology 543
  • Philosophy 255
Replace Ralph M. Turner with:
Ralph M. Turner United States
Simon Dymond United Kingdom
Igor Zwir United States
Wenbo Luo China
Gregory P. Hanley United States
Ogden R. Lindsley United States
Diana Kornbrot United Kingdom
Thomas S. Critchfield United States
Brian Greer United States
Michael F. Dorsey United States
Ben Smith relative to Ralph M. Turner United States Ralph M. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40.3×
Ralph M. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Smith. The network helps show where Ben Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Smith Line = papers co-authored together Ben Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006359
2 2006323
3 2005171
4 200098
5 200695
6 201971
7 201262
8 201958
9 202055
10 200841
11 200738
12 201133
13 200731
14 201926
15 201223
16 201021
17 201120
18 200718
19 201117
20 200616

About Ben Smith

Ben Smith is a scholar working on Information Systems, Clinical Psychology, Software, Signal Processing and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (10 papers), Web Application Security Vulnerabilities (8 papers), Information and Cyber Security (7 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (6 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (5 papers) and Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (678 citations), Software (161 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (360 citations), Clinical Psychology (543 citations) and Philosophy (255 citations). Ben Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Laurie Williams, Paul Bebbington, Elizabeth Kuipers, Daniel Freeman, Philippa Garety, Graham Dunn, David Fowler, James D. Oliver, Kevin C. Daly and Joanne Hodgekins. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Dermatitis, Pediatric Diabetes and Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact