Ben M. Crouch

1.4k citations
27 papers · 972 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ben M. Crouch

25 papers receiving 841 citations

Peers

Ben M. Crouch
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Clinical Psychology 517
  • Sociology and Political Science 802
  • General Health Professions 325
  • Health 104
  • Gender Studies 51
Replace Jody L. Sundt with:
Jody L. Sundt United States
Patrick A. Langan United States
Randall G. Shelden United States
Kevin N. Wright United States
Leo Carroll United States
Alexander M. Holsinger United States
William G. Saylor United States
Shelley Johnson Listwan United States
Gill McIvor United Kingdom
Lisa Pasko United States
Ben M. Crouch relative to Jody L. Sundt United States Jody L. Sundt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jody L. Sundt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben M. Crouch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben M. Crouch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben M. Crouch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben M. Crouch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben M. Crouch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben M. Crouch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben M. Crouch. The network helps show where Ben M. Crouch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ben M. Crouch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben M. Crouch Line = papers co-authored together Ben M. Crouch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997278
2 1993102
3 198271
4 199063
5 200649
6 198144
7 198542
8 198940
9 199035
10 200233
11 198833
12 198431
13 198529
14 199923
15 198014
16 199913
17
First Available Cell: Desegregation of the Texas Prison System
200913
18 199212
19 199111
20 199211

About Ben M. Crouch

Ben M. Crouch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (17 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (517 citations), Sociology and Political Science (802 citations), General Health Professions (325 citations), Health (104 citations) and Gender Studies (51 citations). Ben M. Crouch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James W. Marquart, David Farabee, Dorothy S. McClellan, Geoffrey P. Alpert, Janet L. Mullings, Joycelyn M. Pollock, Daniel Gläser, Victoria E. Brewer, Kelly R. Damphousse and Sheldon Ekland-Olson. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Criminal Justice and Behavior, Justice Quarterly, Journal of Criminal Justice and Law & Society Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact