Beate Müller

2.3k citations
62 papers · 1.7k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Beate Müller

52 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Beate Müller
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 183
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 143
  • Biomaterials 212
  • Organic Chemistry 399
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 240
Replace J. A. Zasadzinski with:
J. A. Zasadzinski United States
Hiroharu Yui Japan
Tohru Takenaka Japan
Richard A. Farrer United States
Daniel A. Higgins United States
Wolfgang Eimer Germany
M. Banaszak Poland
Oliver Werzer Austria
Robin L. Garrell United States
Salvador León Spain
Beate Müller relative to J. A. Zasadzinski United States J. A. Zasadzinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
J. A. Zasadzinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Müller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Müller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Müller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Müller. The network helps show where Beate Müller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beate Müller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beate Müller Line = papers co-authored together Beate Müller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014163
2 1991159
3 2020122
4 2002109
5 1995103
6 199588
7 199973
8 200873
9 202172
10 201368
11 197863
12 200362
13 198956
14 199953
15 200041
16 200640
17 201537
18 201337
19 198834
20 200433

About Beate Müller

Beate Müller is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Sociology and Political Science and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (4 papers), German History and Society (4 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (4 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (3 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (3 papers), Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques (3 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (183 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (143 citations), Biomaterials (212 citations), Organic Chemistry (399 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (240 citations). Beate Müller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include W. Köhler, H. D. Lutz, Katharina Landfester, Simone Wiegand, Alfons Becker, Florian Müller‐Plathe, Dirk Reith, Hans Joachim Räder, Morteza Mahmoudi and Vahid Serpooshan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Macromolecules, German Life and Letters and Solid State Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact