Beate Dombert
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Papers in
-
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 8
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 7
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 1
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 4
- Co-authors
- Michael Osterheider (6 shared papers)Andreas Mokros (9 shared papers)Pekka Santtila (8 shared papers)Rainer Banse (1 shared paper)Peer Briken (1 shared paper)Jürgen Hoyer (1 shared paper)Alexander F. Schmidt (1 shared paper)Janina Neutze (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychiatry Psychology and Law (1 paper)The Journal of Sexual Medicine (1 paper)Sexual Abuse (1 paper)The Journal of Sex Research (1 paper)Archives of Sexual Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyFinlandSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Beate Dombert
10 papers receiving 322 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Clinical Psychology 300
- Gender Studies 65
- Psychiatry and Mental health 53
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
- Sociology and Political Science 131
Countries citing papers authored by Beate Dombert
This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Dombert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Dombert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Dombert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Dombert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Dombert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Dombert. The network helps show where Beate Dombert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Beate Dombert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 180 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 2 |
About Beate Dombert
Beate Dombert is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (300 citations), Gender Studies (65 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (53 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (131 citations). Beate Dombert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Osterheider, Andreas Mokros, Pekka Santtila, Rainer Banse, Peer Briken, Jürgen Hoyer, Alexander F. Schmidt, Janina Neutze, Angelo Zappalà and Timm B. Poeppl. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Psychology and Law, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Sexual Abuse, The Journal of Sex Research and Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.