Bart van Berckel

39 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Bart van Berckel
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 366
  • Neurology 138
  • Ophthalmology 138
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 276
  • Physiology 309
Replace Mara ten Kate with:
Mara ten Kate Netherlands
VL Villemagne Australia
Marion Ortner Germany
Lyduine E. Collij Netherlands
Jori Tomassen Netherlands
Hyo Jung Choi South Korea
Elles Konijnenberg Netherlands
Young Kyoung Jang South Korea
Lena Cavallin Sweden
Gabriela Spulber Sweden
Bart van Berckel relative to Mara ten Kate Netherlands Mara ten Kate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Mara ten Kate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bart van Berckel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bart van Berckel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart van Berckel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart van Berckel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bart van Berckel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart van Berckel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart van Berckel. The network helps show where Bart van Berckel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bart van Berckel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bart van Berckel Line = papers co-authored together Bart van Berckel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013144
2 2021135
3 201996
4 201484
5 201564
6 201756
7 201941
8 199740
9 202023
10 201616
11 201613
12 202312
13 202112
14 202111
15 201911
16 20067
17 20115
18 20224
19 20214
20
Impact of partial volume corrections on quantitative brain PET studies
20123

About Bart van Berckel

Bart van Berckel is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (366 citations), Neurology (138 citations), Ophthalmology (138 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (276 citations) and Physiology (309 citations). Bart van Berckel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip Scheltens, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Rik Ossenkoppele, Frederik Barkhof, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Annapaola Prestia, Michael Schöll and Agneta Nordberg. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Acta Ophthalmologica, NeuroImage, Neuropsychopharmacology and European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact