Barry E. Hammel

961 citations
48 papers · 434 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Barry E. Hammel

44 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Barry E. Hammel
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Horticulture 29
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 369
  • Plant Science 150
  • Molecular Biology 163
  • Food Science 40
Replace W.J.J.O. de Wilde with:
W.J.J.O. de Wilde Netherlands
Terrence W. Walters United States
Jan W. Maas Netherlands
Miriam Monserrat Ferrer Mexico
Mark T. Strong United States
Ian Telford Australia
Heather R. Kates United States
Kent Kainulainen Sweden
Bethany R. M. Williams United Kingdom
Tanya Scharaschkin Australia
Barry E. Hammel relative to W.J.J.O. de Wilde Netherlands W.J.J.O. de Wilde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
W.J.J.O. de Wilde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barry E. Hammel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barry E. Hammel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barry E. Hammel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barry E. Hammel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barry E. Hammel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barry E. Hammel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barry E. Hammel. The network helps show where Barry E. Hammel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barry E. Hammel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barry E. Hammel Line = papers co-authored together Barry E. Hammel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003144
2 200336
3 202131
4 199022
5 198916
6 199314
7 199113
8 199912
9 202111
10
NEW SPECIES OF CLUSIACEAE FROM CENTRAL AMERICA WITH NOTES ON CLUSIA AND SYNONYMY IN THE TRIBE CLUSIEAE
201610
11 19979
12 19999
13 19869
14 20048
15 19797
16 19826
17 19936
18 19896
19 20116
20 20035

About Barry E. Hammel

Barry E. Hammel is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Horticulture and Cell Biology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (29 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (27 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (22 papers), Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (8 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (7 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (5 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (29 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (369 citations), Plant Science (150 citations), Molecular Biology (163 citations) and Food Science (40 citations). Barry E. Hammel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Costa Rica and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Michael H. Grayum, Nelson Zamora, George J. Wilder, Klaus Winter, Hans Gehrig, Frank Almeda, Aurelio Virgo, John C. Cushman, Gerhard Zotz and Jorge Aranda. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Plant Biology, Systematic Botany, Novon A Journal for Botanical Nomenclature and Phytotaxa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact