Barbara E. Teter

29 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Barbara E. Teter
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 591
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 20
  • Aging 3
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 32
  • Reproductive Medicine 15
Replace Maria Antonietta Tommasi with:
Maria Antonietta Tommasi Italy
Earn H Gan United Kingdom
Kelly Claire Simon United States
Enrico Cacace Italy
Silvia Masera Italy
N.D. Powell United States
Vita Direnzo Italy
Mostafa M. Ahmed United States
Ryszard Podemski Poland
Elizabeth A. Secor United States
Barbara E. Teter relative to Maria Antonietta Tommasi Italy Maria Antonietta Tommasi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×
Maria Antonietta Tommasi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara E. Teter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara E. Teter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara E. Teter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara E. Teter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara E. Teter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara E. Teter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara E. Teter. The network helps show where Barbara E. Teter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara E. Teter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara E. Teter Line = papers co-authored together Barbara E. Teter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011200
2 2016151
3 2010107
4 201445
5 201633
6 200632
7 200832
8 201228
9 201628
10 201222
11 201215
12 201615
13 200814
14 201614
15 201213
16 201211
17 201311
18 201511
19 201610
20 20147

About Barbara E. Teter

Barbara E. Teter is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (16 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (3 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (591 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (20 citations), Aging (3 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (32 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (15 citations). Barbara E. Teter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bianca Weinstock‐Guttman, Robert Zivadinov, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Ralph H. B. Benedict, Vasu A Saini, Katelyn S. Kavak, Niels Bergsland, Sara M. Hussein, Jacqueline Durfee and Bijal Kirit Mehta. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Neurology, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact