B. C. Deaton

1.4k citations
39 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

B. C. Deaton

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

B. C. Deaton
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Earth-Surface Processes 216
  • Atmospheric Science 496
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 96
  • Geophysics 205
  • Paleontology 101
Replace M. B. Madsen with:
M. B. Madsen Denmark
Kevin D. Crowley United States
P.E. Potter United Kingdom
Franklin F. Foit United States
P. W. Readman Ireland
J. S. Huebner United States
Y. Bottinga France
H. P. Gunnlaugsson Denmark
Gerhard Oertel United States
M. L. Keith United States
B. C. Deaton relative to M. B. Madsen Denmark M. B. Madsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. B. Madsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. C. Deaton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. C. Deaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. C. Deaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. C. Deaton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. C. Deaton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. C. Deaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. C. Deaton. The network helps show where B. C. Deaton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside B. C. Deaton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. C. Deaton Line = papers co-authored together B. C. Deaton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991261
2 1999106
3 199588
4 198979
5 199676
6 199853
7 196543
8 196343
9 198739
10 201436
11 196534
12 198430
13 196229
14 196624
15 197221
16 196520
17 196419
18
Evaluation of titanium implant components directly fabricated through electron beam melting technology
200617
19 198715
20 200715

About B. C. Deaton

B. C. Deaton is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Geophysics, Condensed Matter Physics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (9 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (5 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (4 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (216 citations), Atmospheric Science (496 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (96 citations), Geophysics (205 citations) and Paleontology (101 citations). B. C. Deaton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William Balsam, John E. Damuth, J. D. Gavenda, F. A. Blum, Bette L. Otto‐Bliesner, Burke Burkart, Carlos A. Dengo, Robert Graf, Junfeng Ji and Earle Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Marine Geology, Journal of Sedimentary Research, Physics Letters A and Carbon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact