B. C. Deaton

1.4k citations
39 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

B. C. Deaton

38 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

B. C. Deaton
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Earth-Surface Processes 205
  • Atmospheric Science 475
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 96
  • Geophysics 192
  • Paleontology 98
Replace M. B. Madsen with:
M. B. Madsen Denmark
Gary A. Smith United States
Kevin D. Crowley United States
P.E. Potter United Kingdom
P. W. Readman Ireland
Franklin F. Foit United States
J. S. Huebner United States
H. P. Gunnlaugsson Denmark
Y. Bottinga France
Gerhard Oertel United States
B. C. Deaton relative to M. B. Madsen Denmark M. B. Madsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. B. Madsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. C. Deaton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. C. Deaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. C. Deaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. C. Deaton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. C. Deaton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. C. Deaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. C. Deaton. The network helps show where B. C. Deaton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside B. C. Deaton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. C. Deaton Line = papers co-authored together B. C. Deaton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991251
2 1999100
3 199577
4 198974
5 199668
6 199850
7 196341
8 196540
9 201436
10 196534
11 198732
12 196227
13 198427
14 196623
15 197219
16
Evaluation of titanium implant components directly fabricated through electron beam melting technology
200617
17 196517
18 196415
19 200714
20 198713

About B. C. Deaton

B. C. Deaton is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Geophysics, Condensed Matter Physics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (9 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (5 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (4 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (205 citations), Atmospheric Science (475 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (96 citations), Geophysics (192 citations) and Paleontology (98 citations). B. C. Deaton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William Balsam, John E. Damuth, F. A. Blum, J. D. Gavenda, Bette L. Otto‐Bliesner, Burke Burkart, Robert Graf, Carlos A. Dengo, Junfeng Ji and Devon Renock. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Geology, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Sedimentary Research, Physics Letters A and Organic Geochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact