Avner Baz

526 citations
43 papers · 290 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
    • Philosophy, Science, and History
    • Philosophy and History of Science

Papers in

    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 21
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 11
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 5
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 17

Avner Baz

38 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Avner Baz
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Philosophy 220
  • History and Philosophy of Science 72
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 150
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 43
  • Family Practice 3
Replace José L. Zalabardo with:
José L. Zalabardo United Kingdom
Diego E. Machuca Argentina
Carrie Jenkins United Kingdom
Marc A. Moffett United States
N. Ángel Pinillos United States
Guy Longworth United Kingdom
Derek Ball United Kingdom
Monima Chadha Australia
Laura Schroeter Australia
Sofia Miguéns Portugal
Avner Baz relative to José L. Zalabardo United Kingdom José L. Zalabardo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
José L. Zalabardo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Avner Baz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Avner Baz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Avner Baz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Avner Baz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Avner Baz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Avner Baz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Avner Baz. The network helps show where Avner Baz may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201284
2 201739
3 200035
4 200325
5 201417
6 201516
7 201214
8 20156
9 20205
10 20164
11 20104
12 20053
13 20153
14 20163
15 20182
16 20122
17 20212
18 20192
19 20202
20 20202

About Avner Baz

Avner Baz is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 43 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (21 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (5 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (220 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (150 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (43 citations) and Family Practice (3 citations). Avner Baz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cuba and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as Inquiry, European Journal of Philosophy, Mind, Synthese and The Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact