Ava Schulz
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Mental Health Research Topics
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 8
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 4
- Mental Health Research Topics 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas Berger (11 shared papers)Tobias Krieger (4 shared papers)Alessia Vincent (4 shared papers)Christian Moser (3 shared papers)Antoine Urech (3 shared papers)Carmen Schaeuffele (2 shared papers)Christine Knaevelsrud (2 shared papers)Johanna Boettcher (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (3 papers)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (1 paper)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
Ava Schulz
13 papers receiving 484 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Applied Psychology 242
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 183
- Clinical Psychology 167
- Social Psychology 53
- Psychiatry and Mental health 16
Countries citing papers authored by Ava Schulz
This map shows the geographic impact of Ava Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ava Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ava Schulz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ava Schulz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ava Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ava Schulz. The network helps show where Ava Schulz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Ava Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 78 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 1 |
About Ava Schulz
Ava Schulz is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Mental Health via Writing (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (242 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (183 citations), Clinical Psychology (167 citations), Social Psychology (53 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (16 citations). Ava Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Berger, Tobias Krieger, Alessia Vincent, Christian Moser, Antoine Urech, Carmen Schaeuffele, Christine Knaevelsrud, Johanna Boettcher, Babette Renneberg and Stefan Westermann. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.