Ava Schulz
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Mental Health Research Topics
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 8
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 4
- Mental Health Research Topics 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas Berger (11 shared papers)Timo Stolz (7 shared papers)Tobias Krieger (4 shared papers)Antoine Urech (3 shared papers)Alessia Vincent (4 shared papers)Christian T. Moser (3 shared papers)Babette Renneberg (2 shared papers)Christine Knaevelsrud (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (3 papers)IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (1 paper)Behaviour Research and Therapy (1 paper)Behavior Therapy (1 paper)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Ava Schulz
13 papers receiving 528 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Applied Psychology 265
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 201
- Clinical Psychology 180
- Social Psychology 62
- General Health Professions 32
Countries citing papers authored by Ava Schulz
This map shows the geographic impact of Ava Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ava Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ava Schulz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ava Schulz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ava Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ava Schulz. The network helps show where Ava Schulz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ava Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 90 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 66 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 2 |
About Ava Schulz
Ava Schulz is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Mental Health via Writing (1 paper), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (1 paper), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper), Family Support in Illness (1 paper) and Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (265 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (201 citations), Clinical Psychology (180 citations), Social Psychology (62 citations) and General Health Professions (32 citations). Ava Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Berger, Timo Stolz, Tobias Krieger, Antoine Urech, Alessia Vincent, Christian T. Moser, Babette Renneberg, Christine Knaevelsrud, Johanna Boettcher and Carmen Schaeuffele. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Behavior Therapy and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.