A.V. Pohm

93 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

A.V. Pohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 886
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 136
  • Radiation 56
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 109
  • Hardware and Architecture 44
Replace Henk C. de Graaff with:
Henk C. de Graaff Netherlands
Miguel Miranda Sweden
Gilbert J. Declerck Belgium
Greg A. Northrop United States
Min-Fong Yang Taiwan
M.E. Hines United States
Patrick Geßler Germany
Uwe Paschen Germany
Christophe Jany France
Kamal Batcha Mohamed Ismail United States
A.V. Pohm relative to Henk C. de Graaff Netherlands Henk C. de Graaff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
Henk C. de Graaff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.V. Pohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.V. Pohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.V. Pohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.V. Pohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.V. Pohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.V. Pohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.V. Pohm. The network helps show where A.V. Pohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.V. Pohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.V. Pohm Line = papers co-authored together A.V. Pohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994162
2 1958101
3 199984
4 200060
5 195653
6 200348
7 195447
8 198847
9 195246
10 199741
11 199829
12 200329
13 200319
14 198918
15 199918
16 200318
17 199517
18 198416
19 196415
20 198915

About A.V. Pohm

A.V. Pohm is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Hardware and Architecture, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Radiation, having authored 107 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (81 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (14 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (11 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (7 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (5 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (4 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (886 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (136 citations), Radiation (56 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (109 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (44 citations). A.V. Pohm has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include James Michael Daughton, Russell S. Beech, Erling N. Jensen, B.A. Everitt, John M. Anderson, Catherine A. Nordman, Albrecht Jander, Hah Young Yoo, Om P. Agrawal and William C. Black. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics, Computer, Proceedings of the IEEE and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact