Asmita Joshi
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
-
- Birth, Development, and Health
Papers in
-
- Birth, Development, and Health 8
- Maternal and fetal healthcare 2
-
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 7
- Co-authors
- Sadhana Joshi (12 shared papers)Savita Mehendale (5 shared papers)Girija Wagh (4 shared papers)Deepali Sundrani (3 shared papers)Hemlata Pisal (4 shared papers)Preeti Chavan (2 shared papers)Sanjay Gupte (3 shared papers)Nisha Wadhwani (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Asmita Joshi
14 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 262
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 208
- Nutrition and Dietetics 70
- Rheumatology 65
- Immunology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Asmita Joshi
This map shows the geographic impact of Asmita Joshi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Asmita Joshi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asmita Joshi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Asmita Joshi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Asmita Joshi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Asmita Joshi. The network helps show where Asmita Joshi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Asmita Joshi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 3 |
About Asmita Joshi
Asmita Joshi is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rheumatology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (8 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (7 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (6 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers) and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (262 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (208 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (70 citations), Rheumatology (65 citations) and Immunology (51 citations). Asmita Joshi has collaborated with scholars based in India, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sadhana Joshi, Savita Mehendale, Girija Wagh, Deepali Sundrani, Hemlata Pisal, Preeti Chavan, Sanjay Gupte, Nisha Wadhwani, Anvita Kale and Giriraj R. Chandak. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, Reproduction Fertility and Development and Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.