Ashkan Ebadi

36 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Ashkan Ebadi
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Health Informatics 80
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 167
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 57
  • Information Systems and Management 39
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 39
Replace Jernej Završnik with:
Jernej Završnik Slovenia
Gerit Wagner Germany
Daniel Duma United Kingdom
Syed Sibte Raza Abidi Canada
Andrew Turner United Kingdom
Nisa Bakkalbasi United States
Stefan Schulz Germany
Anton Ninkov Canada
Paolo Crosetto France
Ashkan Ebadi relative to Jernej Završnik Slovenia Jernej Završnik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Jernej Završnik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ashkan Ebadi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ashkan Ebadi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashkan Ebadi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashkan Ebadi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ashkan Ebadi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashkan Ebadi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashkan Ebadi. The network helps show where Ashkan Ebadi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ashkan Ebadi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ashkan Ebadi Line = papers co-authored together Ashkan Ebadi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018225
2 2016103
3 201594
4 201563
5 201357
6 201752
7 201740
8 202230
9 201520
10 201619
11 202018
12 201316
13 202216
14 202314
15 201712
16 202111
17 201610
18 20228
19 20198
20 20167

About Ashkan Ebadi

Ashkan Ebadi is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Economics and Econometrics and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 869 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (5 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (4 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (4 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (80 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (167 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (57 citations), Information Systems and Management (39 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (39 citations). Ashkan Ebadi has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Schiffauerova, Parisa Rashidi, Azra Bihorac, Tezcan Ozrazgat‐Baslanti, Lyle L. Moldawer, Frederick A. Moore, P. M. Pardalos, Stéphane Tremblay, Daisy Zhe Wang and Gloria Lipori. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, Sensors, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact