Arthur Field

602 citations
11 papers · 345 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 6
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 2

Arthur Field

10 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Arthur Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Classics 125
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 27
  • History 128
  • General Arts and Humanities 8
  • Transportation 38
Replace A. J. Pollard with:
A. J. Pollard United Kingdom
Xosé Manuel Santos Solla Spain
Maurizio Peleggi Singapore
Bernard Mees Australia
John W. Cairns United Kingdom
Shelagh J. Squire Canada
Earl Finbar Murphy United States
Waleed Hazbun Lebanon
Lowry Nelson United States
Priscilla Boniface India
Arthur Field relative to A. J. Pollard United Kingdom A. J. Pollard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
A. J. Pollard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arthur Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur Field. The network helps show where Arthur Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Arthur Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arthur Field Line = papers co-authored together Arthur Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1988145
2 1999120
3 200026
4 199720
5 199910
6 19867
7 19986
8 20174
9 19904
10 19783
11 20170

About Arthur Field

Arthur Field is a scholar working on History, Classics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (6 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (1 paper), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (1 paper), Water Quality and Resources Studies (1 paper), Noise Effects and Management (1 paper), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (125 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (27 citations), History (128 citations), General Arts and Humanities (8 citations) and Transportation (38 citations). Arthur Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. McKnew, George W. Kling, Danny Elder, Glenn S. Carter, Peder M. Yurista, Luís Schiesari, Thomas B. Bridgeman, Kimberly L. Schulz and Shazia Aslam. Their work appears in journals such as Renaissance Quarterly, Journal of Travel Research, Quaderni d italianistica, Lake and Reservoir Management and Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact