Arthur F. Wright

2.0k citations
55 papers · 781 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Arthur F. Wright

43 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Arthur F. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cultural Studies 177
  • Sociology and Political Science 530
  • Anthropology 112
  • Religious studies 37
  • Political Science and International Relations 150
Replace Derk Bodde with:
Derk Bodde United States
Nina Baym United States
Sacvan Bercovitch United States
Patricia Buckley Ebrey United States
Arthur W. Hummel United States
Nancy Armstrong United States
Anne Tedeschi United States
V. S. Naipaul
Louis B. Wright United States
John Tedeschi United States
Arthur F. Wright relative to Derk Bodde United States Derk Bodde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Derk Bodde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arthur F. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur F. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur F. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur F. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur F. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur F. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur F. Wright. The network helps show where Arthur F. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Arthur F. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arthur F. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Arthur F. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975131
2
Confucianism in action
195969
3 196660
4 195455
5
The Confucian persuasion
196049
6 196947
7 196141
8 195936
9 196235
10 196334
11 197422
12 196721
13 196119
14 195414
15 196113
16 196012
17 195311
18
The school experiences of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Western Australia
20189
19 19639
20 19579

About Arthur F. Wright

Arthur F. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Cultural Studies, Anthropology and Philosophy, having authored 55 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (27 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (10 papers), Japanese History and Culture (9 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (177 citations), Sociology and Political Science (530 citations), Anthropology (112 citations), Religious studies (37 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (150 citations). Arthur F. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Arthur P. Wolf, David S. Nivison, Denis Twitchett, John W. Hall, John Κ. Fairbank, Harrison M. Wright, E. A. Kracke, Étienne Balázs, Arthur Waley and Charles O. Hucker. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Asian Studies, Pacific Affairs, Journal of the History of Ideas and Philosophy East and West.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact