AR Dixon
Impact in
- Dermatology top 2%
- Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
- Oncology 14
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 5
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 5
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 3
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 11
- Co-authors
- Ian O. Ellis (10 shared papers)R.W. Blamey (6 shared papers)C.W. Elston (3 shared papers)Sarah E. Pinder (1 shared paper)C.W. Elston (4 shared papers)R.W. Blamey (3 shared papers)D F L Watkin (2 shared papers)M.H. Galea (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (7 papers)Histopathology (2 papers)Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2 papers)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers)Postgraduate Medical Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
AR Dixon
27 papers receiving 990 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Dermatology 240
- Cancer Research 264
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 313
- Oncology 328
- Immunology and Allergy 24
Countries citing papers authored by AR Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of AR Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by AR Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AR Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by AR Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by AR Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by AR Dixon. The network helps show where AR Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside AR Dixon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 218 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 179 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 124 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 67 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 65 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 58 | |
| 7 | Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial. | 1990 | 45 |
| 8 | 1992 | 41 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 36 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 33 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 23 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 12 |
About AR Dixon
AR Dixon is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Genetics, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (8 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (240 citations), Cancer Research (264 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (313 citations), Oncology (328 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (24 citations). AR Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, R.W. Blamey, C.W. Elston, Sarah E. Pinder, C.W. Elston, R.W. Blamey, D F L Watkin, M.H. Galea, CW Elston and RW Blamey. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Histopathology, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and Postgraduate Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.