AR Dixon
Impact in
- Dermatology top 2%
- Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
- Oncology 17
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 5
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 5
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 4
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 3
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 11
- Co-authors
- Ian O. Ellis (10 shared papers)R.W. Blamey (6 shared papers)C.W. Elston (3 shared papers)Sarah E. Pinder (1 shared paper)D F L Watkin (2 shared papers)R.W. Blamey (3 shared papers)C.W. Elston (4 shared papers)CW Elston (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (7 papers)Histopathology (2 papers)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers)The Breast (2 papers)Colorectal Disease (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
AR Dixon
26 papers receiving 955 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Dermatology 273
- Cancer Research 315
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 336
- Oncology 411
- Surgery 214
Countries citing papers authored by AR Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of AR Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by AR Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AR Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by AR Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by AR Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by AR Dixon. The network helps show where AR Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside AR Dixon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 196 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 174 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 112 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 62 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 57 | |
| 7 | Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial. | 1990 | 45 |
| 8 | 1992 | 38 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 33 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 23 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 12 |
About AR Dixon
AR Dixon is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Genetics, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (8 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (273 citations), Cancer Research (315 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (336 citations), Oncology (411 citations) and Surgery (214 citations). AR Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, R.W. Blamey, C.W. Elston, Sarah E. Pinder, D F L Watkin, R.W. Blamey, C.W. Elston, CW Elston, M.H. Galea and RW Blamey. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Histopathology, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, The Breast and Colorectal Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.