Antonio Penta

44 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Antonio Penta
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • General Decision Sciences 45
  • Safety Research 164
  • Management Science and Operations Research 246
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 123
  • Information Systems 122
Replace Meike Zehlike with:
Meike Zehlike Germany
Theodore L. Turocy United States
Leslie R. Fine United States
Marija Slavkovik Norway
Himan Abdollahpouri United States
Yunqi Li United States
Fatih Gedikli Germany
Michael Jugovac Germany
Tim Donkers Germany
Antonio Penta relative to Meike Zehlike Germany Meike Zehlike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Meike Zehlike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Antonio Penta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio Penta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio Penta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio Penta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio Penta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio Penta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio Penta. The network helps show where Antonio Penta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Antonio Penta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Antonio Penta Line = papers co-authored together Antonio Penta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015108
2 201461
3 200828
4 201127
5 201726
6 200825
7 201525
8 202024
9 201424
10 201223
11 200821
12 202019
13 201218
14 201313
15 201311
16 200811
17 200911
18 200710
19 20127
20 20087

About Antonio Penta

Antonio Penta is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety Research and Signal Processing, having authored 48 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (10 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (10 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (8 papers), Economic theories and models (7 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (7 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (45 citations), Safety Research (164 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (246 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (123 citations) and Information Systems (122 citations). Antonio Penta has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Larbi Chrifi‐Alaoui, Antonio Picariello, Vincenzo Moscato, Flora Amato, Antonino Mazzeo, Carlo Sansone, Ilaria Bartolini, Maria Luisa Sapino, Ruggero G. Pensa and Fabio Persia. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Economics, Journal of Economic Theory, The Review of Economic Studies, IEEE Security & Privacy and Journal of Mathematical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact