Anthony D. Lien
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 6
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 4
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 1
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 7
- Co-authors
- Massimo Scanziani (4 shared papers)Kimberly Reinhold (2 shared papers)Robert J. Gillies (1 shared paper)Ian Robey (1 shared paper)Sarah J. Welsh (1 shared paper)Brenda Baggett (1 shared paper)Bilal Haider (3 shared papers)Michael Krumin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuron (2 papers)Nature Neuroscience (2 papers)Frontiers in Neural Circuits (1 paper)Neoplasia (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anthony D. Lien
8 papers receiving 785 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cognitive Neuroscience 516
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 416
- Cancer Research 147
- Sensory Systems 26
- Molecular Biology 231
Countries citing papers authored by Anthony D. Lien
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony D. Lien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony D. Lien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony D. Lien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony D. Lien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony D. Lien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony D. Lien. The network helps show where Anthony D. Lien may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Anthony D. Lien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 230 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 206 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 110 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 85 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 |
About Anthony D. Lien
Anthony D. Lien is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 797 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (1 paper), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (1 paper) and High Altitude and Hypoxia (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (516 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (416 citations), Cancer Research (147 citations), Sensory Systems (26 citations) and Molecular Biology (231 citations). Anthony D. Lien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Massimo Scanziani, Kimberly Reinhold, Robert J. Gillies, Ian Robey, Sarah J. Welsh, Brenda Baggett, Bilal Haider, Michael Krumin, Aslı Ayaz and Laura Busse. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Nature Neuroscience, Frontiers in Neural Circuits, Neoplasia and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.