Annie Procter

2.3k citations
14 papers · 421 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Annie Procter

14 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Annie Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 256
  • Genetics 197
  • Cancer Research 53
  • Molecular Biology 163
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 45
Replace George Jeha with:
George Jeha United States
Michael B. Ranke Germany
Maria Kalina Poland
C R Buchanan India
Takashi Kamijo Japan
Mars Skae United Kingdom
Ron G. Rosenfeld United States
Abdullah Al‐Ashwal Saudi Arabia
Manuel Fontoura Portugal
Margaret E. Bock Canada
Annie Procter relative to George Jeha United States George Jeha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
George Jeha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annie Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annie Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annie Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annie Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annie Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annie Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annie Procter. The network helps show where Annie Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annie Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annie Procter Line = papers co-authored together Annie Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1998116
2 200388
3 200375
4 200435
5 200928
6 200624
7 199818
8 201715
9 20169
10 20096
11 19993
12
Survey of genetic testing in childhood
19992
13 20231
14
Attitudes to genetic testing in childhood in England and Wales
19991

About Annie Procter

Annie Procter is a scholar working on Genetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (6 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Lipid metabolism and disorders (2 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (1 paper), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper) and Cleft Lip and Palate Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (256 citations), Genetics (197 citations), Cancer Research (53 citations), Molecular Biology (163 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (45 citations). Annie Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D.N. Cooper, John A. Phillips, Martin Horan, Linda Fryklund, Michael Krawczak, David Millar, Geraint F. Lewis, Jürgen Hedderich, M. F. Scanlon and Mark Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Human Mutation, Human Genetics, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics, European Journal of Human Genetics and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact