Anne Ring Petersen

656 citations
41 papers · 269 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Ring Petersen

31 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Anne Ring Petersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Safety Research 48
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 25
  • Urban Studies 28
  • Museology 14
Replace Neda Atanasoski with:
Neda Atanasoski United States
Suzanne Smythe Canada
Elsie Rockwell Mexico
Adriana Puiggrós Argentina
Jo Haynes United Kingdom
Danae De los Ríos Chile
Padma M. Sarangapani India
Inmaculada Gómez Hurtado Spain
Charles R. Acland Canada
Anand R. Marri United States
Anne Ring Petersen relative to Neda Atanasoski United States Neda Atanasoski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Neda Atanasoski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Ring Petersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Ring Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Ring Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Ring Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Ring Petersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Ring Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Ring Petersen. The network helps show where Anne Ring Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Anne Ring Petersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Ring Petersen Line = papers co-authored together Anne Ring Petersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202185
2 201738
3 201633
4 201918
5 201713
6
The Culture of Migration: Politics, Aesthetics and Histories
201512
7
Migration into art: Transcultural identities and art-making in a globalised world
201710
8 20217
9 20195
10
Introduction: Towards a Postmigrant Frame of Reading
20195
11 20124
12 20194
13 20214
14 20233
15 20203
16 20193
17 20193
18 20192
19 20212
20 20202

About Anne Ring Petersen

Anne Ring Petersen is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Museology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (9 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (4 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (10 citations), Safety Research (48 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (25 citations), Urban Studies (28 citations) and Museology (14 citations). Anne Ring Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, India and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Selma C. Rudert, Stefan Janke and Martin H. Daumiller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of AESTHETICS & CULTURE, Art History, Third Text, Nka Journal of Contemporary African Art and BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact