Anne Locksley

1.4k citations
15 papers · 1.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Locksley

15 papers receiving 956 citations

Anne Locksley's Hit Papers

Sex stereotypes and social judgment. 1980 · 396 citations
3960+15+30Years since publication100200300

Peers

Anne Locksley
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • General Decision Sciences 138
  • Gender Studies 370
  • Applied Psychology 126
  • Social Psychology 364
  • Sociology and Political Science 642
Replace Christine Hepburn with:
Christine Hepburn United States
Meryl Lichtenstein United States
Suzanne J. LaFleur United States
Paget H. Gross United States
R. Jack Weber United States
Charles T. Hill United States
Matthew J. Lindberg United States
Jill M. Leibold United States
Mansur Lalljee United Kingdom
Carolyn H. Simmons United States
Anne Locksley relative to Christine Hepburn United States Christine Hepburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christine Hepburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Locksley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Locksley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Locksley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Locksley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Locksley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Locksley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Locksley. The network helps show where Anne Locksley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Anne Locksley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Locksley Line = papers co-authored together Anne Locksley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Sex stereotypes and social judgment.
Hit paper breakdown →
1980396
2 1982238
3 1979139
4 1980129
5 198065
6 198438
7 198028
8 198423
9 198219
10 19828
11 19837
12 19807
13 19846
14 19793
15 19821

About Anne Locksley

Anne Locksley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (138 citations), Gender Studies (370 citations), Applied Psychology (126 citations), Social Psychology (364 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (642 citations). Anne Locksley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christine Hepburn, Vilma Ortiz, Eugene Borgida, Nancy Brekke, Mary Ellen Colten and Charles Stangor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Social Psychology Quarterly, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Journal of Research in Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact