Anne Booth

95 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anne Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Development 90
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 203
  • Sociology and Political Science 759
  • Economics and Econometrics 449
  • Political Science and International Relations 322
Replace Charles Gore with:
Charles Gore United States
Sanjeev Khagram United States
Dwight H. Perkins United States
Shahid Yusuf United States
Patrick Heller United States
Ajay Chhibber United States
Bill Freund South Africa
Nagesh Ram India
Hal Hill Australia
Jan Breman Netherlands
Anne Booth relative to Charles Gore United States Charles Gore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Charles Gore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Booth. The network helps show where Anne Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Anne Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Booth Line = papers co-authored together Anne Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988219
2 199999
3 199869
4
Keuangan pemerintah daerah di Indonesia
198965
5 199764
6 200056
7 199339
8 200336
9 201133
10 199032
11 200731
12 201628
13 200726
14 199926
15 199926
16 198922
17 200219
18
Labour absorption in agriculture
198519
19
Sejarah ekonomi indonesia
198818
20
Labour absorption in agriculture : theoretical analysis and empirical investigations
198218

About Anne Booth

Anne Booth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Soil Science, having authored 106 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (35 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (11 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (7 papers), Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies (7 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (7 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (6 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (90 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (203 citations), Sociology and Political Science (759 citations), Economics and Econometrics (449 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (322 citations). Anne Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Raman Sundrum, Roy Kelly, Nick Devas, Elan Satriawan, A. W. Coats, Kent Deng, Paul Mosley, Kathleen Gough, Thee Kian Wie and Bruce Glassburner. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, Itinerario, The Journal of Development Studies and Australian Economic History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact