Anne Booth

113 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Anne Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Development 133
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 241
  • Sociology and Political Science 906
  • Economics and Econometrics 509
  • Political Science and International Relations 404
Replace Nagesh Ram with:
Nagesh Ram India
Patrick Heller United States
Salvador Giner Spain
Charles Gore United States
Sanjeev Khagram United States
Samir Amin Malaysia
Douglas Rimmer United Kingdom
Harvey Armstrong United Kingdom
Bill Freund South Africa
Dwight H. Perkins United States
Anne Booth relative to Nagesh Ram India Nagesh Ram's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Nagesh Ram · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Booth. The network helps show where Anne Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Anne Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Booth Line = papers co-authored together Anne Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988223
2 1999123
3 199888
4 199772
5
Keuangan pemerintah daerah di Indonesia
198967
6 200064
7 199343
8 200738
9 200337
10 201137
11 200735
12 199033
13 201632
14 199929
15 199926
16 200125
17 201622
18 198922
19 201221
20 200521

About Anne Booth

Anne Booth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Soil Science, having authored 129 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (47 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (13 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (9 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (8 papers), Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies (8 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (7 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (133 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (241 citations), Sociology and Political Science (906 citations), Economics and Econometrics (509 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (404 citations). Anne Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Raman Sundrum, Paul Mosley, Nick Devas, Roy Kelly, Kent Deng, Elan Satriawan, A. W. Coats, Ewout Frankema, Kathleen Gough and Christopher D. Manning. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, Itinerario, Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia and Australian Economic History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact