Anna Vespa

25 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Anna Vespa
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Health 56
  • Clinical Psychology 62
  • Applied Psychology 13
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Oncology 66
Replace Sha-Lai Williams with:
Sha-Lai Williams United States
Seda Pehlivan Türkiye
Rajni Banthia United States
Geok Ling Lee Singapore
Silvia Varani Italy
Joseph B. Straton United States
Jorge Maté-Méndez Spain
Lakeshia Cousin United States
Jon Tomas United Kingdom
Ingela Beck Sweden
Anna Vespa relative to Sha-Lai Williams United States Sha-Lai Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Sha-Lai Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Vespa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Vespa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Vespa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Vespa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Vespa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Vespa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Vespa. The network helps show where Anna Vespa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Vespa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Vespa Line = papers co-authored together Anna Vespa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201655
2 201846
3 201637
4 201033
5 201824
6 199619
7 201915
8 202314
9 201411
10 200111
11 202310
12 200910
13 20219
14 20169
15 20028
16 20125
17 20215
18 20194
19 20224
20 20243

About Anna Vespa

Anna Vespa is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Oncology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (3 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (56 citations), Clinical Psychology (62 citations), Applied Psychology (13 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations) and Oncology (66 citations). Anna Vespa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Roberta Spatuzzi, Paolo Fabbietti, Liana Spazzafumo, Lodovico Balducci, Claudia Cormio, Domenico Bilancia, Paul B. Jacobsen, Aureliano Fraticelli, Rosaria Gesuita and E Paciaroni. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Cancer Control, Supportive Care in Cancer, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact