Anna Thit Johnsen

69 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Anna Thit Johnsen
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Oncology 412
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 306
  • Hematology 84
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 133
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 103
Replace Ann M. O’Mara with:
Ann M. O’Mara United States
Constance Visovsky United States
Stephen L. Huber United States
Jamie M. Jacobs United States
Cindy Tofthagen United States
Jane E. Graydon Canada
Sharon Kozachik United States
Elke Van Hoof Belgium
Ann Marie Dose United States
Ollie Minton United Kingdom
Anna Thit Johnsen relative to Ann M. O’Mara United States Ann M. O’Mara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ann M. O’Mara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Thit Johnsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Thit Johnsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Thit Johnsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Thit Johnsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Thit Johnsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Thit Johnsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Thit Johnsen. The network helps show where Anna Thit Johnsen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Thit Johnsen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Thit Johnsen Line = papers co-authored together Anna Thit Johnsen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009182
2 2009111
3 199487
4 201769
5 201767
6 202055
7 201253
8 202053
9 198949
10 200541
11 201540
12 201740
13 198636
14 201135
15 201134
16 201130
17 201829
18 201929
19 201727
20 201626

About Anna Thit Johnsen

Anna Thit Johnsen is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (14 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (14 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (412 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (306 citations), Hematology (84 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (133 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (103 citations). Anna Thit Johnsen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mogens Grøenvold, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Lise Pedersen, Lone Ross, Dorte Tholstrup, Lise Pedersen, M. Groenvold, Thora Grothe Thomsen, Clara Rübner Jørgensen and Niels A. Lassen. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Palliative Medicine, Acta Oncologica, Quality of Life Research and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact