Anna Starr
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Ion Channels and Receptors
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Papers in
-
- Ion Channels and Receptors 6
- Physiology 12
- Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects 7
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- Susan Diana Brain (6 shared papers)Manasi Nandi (12 shared papers)Julie Elizabeth Keeble (2 shared papers)Erika Pintér (2 shared papers)Bradley H. Curtis (1 shared paper)Fiona Anne Russell (1 shared paper)Keith M. Channon (3 shared papers)Surawee Chuaiphichai (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Vascular Pharmacology (4 papers)Nitric Oxide (2 papers)Journal of Applied Physiology (1 paper)F1000Research (1 paper)Shock (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHungaryBrazil
In The Last Decade
Anna Starr
18 papers receiving 644 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sensory Systems 173
- Physiology 181
- Immunology 127
- Complementary and alternative medicine 41
- Biochemistry 36
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Starr
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Starr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Starr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Starr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Starr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Starr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Starr. The network helps show where Anna Starr may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Starr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 207 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 138 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 18 | murine models of sepsis sensitive and clinically relevant prognostic marker in Quantification of microcirculatory blood flow: a | 2015 | 1 |
About Anna Starr
Anna Starr is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Physiology, Biochemistry, Nephrology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 652 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (7 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (2 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (173 citations), Physiology (181 citations), Immunology (127 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (41 citations) and Biochemistry (36 citations). Anna Starr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Susan Diana Brain, Manasi Nandi, Julie Elizabeth Keeble, Erika Pintér, Bradley H. Curtis, Fiona Anne Russell, Keith M. Channon, Surawee Chuaiphichai, Eileen McNeill and Mark J. Crabtree. Their work appears in journals such as Vascular Pharmacology, Nitric Oxide, Journal of Applied Physiology, F1000Research and Shock.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.