Anna R. Dover

2.1k citations
30 papers · 616 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Anna R. Dover

27 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Anna R. Dover
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 372
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 53
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 21
  • Hepatology 26
  • Surgery 134
Replace Sabine Kenouch with:
Sabine Kenouch France
Maryam Nasiri Iran
Marissa Penna-Martinez Germany
Hongrong Deng China
Melissa J Gillett Australia
M. Lombardo Italy
Mikiya Usukura Japan
Saptarshi Bhattacharya India
Timothy M. Boehm United States
Anna R. Dover relative to Sabine Kenouch France Sabine Kenouch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×55×
Sabine Kenouch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna R. Dover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna R. Dover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna R. Dover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna R. Dover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna R. Dover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna R. Dover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna R. Dover. The network helps show where Anna R. Dover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna R. Dover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna R. Dover Line = papers co-authored together Anna R. Dover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019125
2 200593
3 202045
4 200643
5 200542
6 201837
7 202132
8 201829
9 201624
10 202023
11 200621
12 202320
13 202013
14 200611
15 200710
16 20239
17 20188
18 20238
19 20207
20
Barriers, Facilitators, and Potential Solutions to Advancing Interoperable Clinical Decision Support: Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Recommendations for the Opioid Use Case.
20197

About Anna R. Dover

Anna R. Dover is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Genetics, Ophthalmology and Pharmacology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (12 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (2 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (2 papers) and Apelin-related biomedical research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (372 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (53 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (21 citations), Hepatology (26 citations) and Surgery (134 citations). Anna R. Dover has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Fraser W. Gibb, Nicola N. Zammitt, Roland H. Stimson, John McKnight, Stuart A. Ritchie, Patrick W. F. Hadoke, Gary R. Small, Brian R. Walker, Mark W. J. Strachan and David E. Newby. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetic Medicine, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, Diabetologia, Clinical Endocrinology and Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact