Anna Prinster

3.1k citations
61 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Prinster

59 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Anna Prinster
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 517
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 412
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 282
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 210
  • Sensory Systems 67
Replace Natalie M. Zahr with:
Natalie M. Zahr United States
Donna J. Cross United States
Matthias Reimold Germany
S. Asenbaum Austria
Shingo Kakeda Japan
Cláudia C. Leite Brazil
Edwin Mak Canada
Ken Okada Japan
G Rosadini Italy
Ellen L. Air United States
Anna Prinster relative to Natalie M. Zahr United States Natalie M. Zahr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Natalie M. Zahr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Prinster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Prinster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Prinster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Prinster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Prinster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Prinster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Prinster. The network helps show where Anna Prinster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Prinster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Prinster Line = papers co-authored together Anna Prinster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Integrated software for the analysis of brain PET/SPECT studies with partial-volume-effect correction.
2004192
2 2012179
3 2015166
4 1997142
5 2005141
6 2015106
7 200985
8 201783
9 201065
10 201750
11 199647
12 201245
13 200939
14 199736
15 201435
16 201735
17 201734
18 201832
19 201731
20 201729

About Anna Prinster

Anna Prinster is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (10 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (517 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (412 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (282 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (210 citations) and Sensory Systems (67 citations). Anna Prinster has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mario Quarantelli, Marco Salvatore, Arturo Brunetti, Bruno Alfano, Jean‐Claude Baron, Roberta Lanzillo, Angela A. Rivellese, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Giovanni Annuzzi and Marcello Mancini. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, PLoS ONE, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and European Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact