Anna Pink

16 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Anna Pink
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 190
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 11
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Physiology 68
Replace Alicja Cieślak with:
Alicja Cieślak United States
Francine Parfitt United States
Ding Ding China
Dana M. Swenson-Dravis United States
Roberta Ghiretti Italy
Sarah L. Aghjayan United States
Paula Iso‐Markku Finland
L. Lechowski France
Kristiina Hongisto Finland
Jony Arrais Pinto Brazil
Anna Pink relative to Alicja Cieślak United States Alicja Cieślak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Alicja Cieślak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Pink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Pink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Pink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Pink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Pink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Pink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Pink. The network helps show where Anna Pink may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Pink, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Pink Line = papers co-authored together Anna Pink links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201599
2 201772
3 201753
4 201632
5 202126
6 201624
7 201720
8 201616
9 202310
10 20141
11
Dirofilaria immitis, ¿ha llegado a Mallorca?
20101
12 20251
13 20081
14 20161
15 20131
16 20161
17 20250

About Anna Pink

Anna Pink is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Infectious Diseases, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (15 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (1 paper), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (1 paper), Insects and Parasite Interactions (1 paper), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (190 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (11 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations) and Physiology (68 citations). Anna Pink has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Yonas E. Geda, Ronald C. Petersen, Gorazd B. Stokin, Janina Krell‐Roesch, David S. Knopman, Rosebud O. Roberts, Michelle M. Mielke, Teresa J. Christianson, Prashanthi Vemuri and Clifford R. Jack. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Neurology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and JAMA Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact