Anna Pendergrass

690 citations
33 papers · 353 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Pendergrass

26 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Anna Pendergrass
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 153
  • General Health Professions 143
  • Clinical Psychology 104
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
Replace Frøydis Bruvik with:
Frøydis Bruvik Norway
Tamara Backhouse United Kingdom
Hsueh‐Fen S. Kao United States
Lulu Liao China
L. Jansen Canada
Remco Tuijt United Kingdom
Jacqueline van der Lee Netherlands
Maria Alice Tourinho Baptista Brazil
Kei Kudo Japan
Érica Nestor Souza Brazil
Anna Pendergrass relative to Frøydis Bruvik Norway Frøydis Bruvik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Frøydis Bruvik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Pendergrass

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Pendergrass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Pendergrass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Pendergrass more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Pendergrass

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Pendergrass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Pendergrass. The network helps show where Anna Pendergrass may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Anna Pendergrass, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Pendergrass Line = papers co-authored together Anna Pendergrass links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201886
2 201860
3 201843
4 202023
5 201919
6 201918
7 201517
8 201515
9 201710
10 20238
11 20218
12 20207
13 20157
14 20226
15 20225
16 20243
17 20163
18 20213
19 20182
20 20242

About Anna Pendergrass

Anna Pendergrass is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 33 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (14 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (11 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers) and Health and Medical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (153 citations), General Health Professions (143 citations), Clinical Psychology (104 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations). Anna Pendergrass has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Elmar Graessel, Carolin Donath, S. Engel, Clemens Becker, Martin Hautzinger, Klaus Pfeiffer, Mary Mittelman, Katharina Luttenberger, Elmar Gräßel and Jennifer Scheel. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, BMC Health Services Research, BMJ Open, BMC Psychology and BMC Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact