Anna Pendergrass

741 citations
35 papers · 402 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Pendergrass

32 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Anna Pendergrass
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 106
  • General Health Professions 66
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
  • Clinical Psychology 53
  • Rehabilitation 16
Replace Ling‐Hui Chang with:
Ling‐Hui Chang Taiwan
Maryam Mafi Iran
Sokha Koeuth United States
Keigo Kumamoto Japan
Deborah Brooks Australia
Lisa D. van Mierlo Netherlands
Kara Bottiggi Dassel United States
Runlian He China
Maria Alice Tourinho Baptista Brazil
Kei Kudo Japan
Anna Pendergrass relative to Ling‐Hui Chang Taiwan Ling‐Hui Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Ling‐Hui Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Pendergrass

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Pendergrass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Pendergrass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Pendergrass more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Pendergrass

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Pendergrass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Pendergrass. The network helps show where Anna Pendergrass may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Anna Pendergrass, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Pendergrass Line = papers co-authored together Anna Pendergrass links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201893
2 201867
3 201847
4 202025
5 201919
6 201518
7 201918
8 201517
9 202113
10 201710
11 20159
12 20239
13 20228
14 20207
15 20225
16 20244
17 20164
18 20183
19 20243
20 20243

About Anna Pendergrass

Anna Pendergrass is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Rehabilitation, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers), Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (2 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (106 citations), General Health Professions (66 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations), Clinical Psychology (53 citations) and Rehabilitation (16 citations). Anna Pendergrass has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Elmar Graessel, Carolin Donath, Klaus Pfeiffer, S. Engel, Martin Hautzinger, Clemens Becker, Mary Sherman Mittelman, Elmar Gräßel, Katharina Luttenberger and Jennifer Scheel. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, BMC Health Services Research, Das Gesundheitswesen, BMC Medicine and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact