Anna O’Connor

65 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Anna O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 675
  • Ophthalmology 169
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 317
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 262
  • Epidemiology 412
Replace Sherry L. Fawcett with:
Sherry L. Fawcett United States
Franziska Georgia Rauscher Germany
Bernd F. Remler United States
Mohammad Hadi Aarabi Iran
Hardy Baumbach Germany
Bang‐Bon Koo United States
Abhishek Lenka India
Gianpaolo Toscano Italy
Shaban Demirel United States
Hyungsuk Kim South Korea
Anna O’Connor relative to Sherry L. Fawcett United States Sherry L. Fawcett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Sherry L. Fawcett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna O’Connor. The network helps show where Anna O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together Anna O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002229
2 2010185
3 2007132
4 2004115
5 2006103
6 2002101
7 201078
8 200477
9 200175
10 201468
11 201850
12 201039
13 201336
14 202135
15 200730
16 200530
17 200629
18 201628
19 200826
20 201621

About Anna O’Connor

Anna O’Connor is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (20 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (19 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (675 citations), Ophthalmology (169 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (317 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (262 citations) and Epidemiology (412 citations). Anna O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eileen E. Birch, Alistair R. Fielder, Susan Anderson, C Wilson, Marianne E. F. Piano, Terence J. Stephenson, Merrick J. Moseley, Sonia Ratib, Michael Tobin and Sarah E. Morale. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Eye and Strabismus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact