Anna Majda

74 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

Anna Majda
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Communication 51
  • Leadership and Management 8
  • Applied Psychology 21
  • Clinical Psychology 84
Replace Pei‐Lun Hsieh with:
Pei‐Lun Hsieh Taiwan
Gonca Karayağız Muslu Türkiye
Mary K. Kirkpatrick United States
Ryan McMullan Australia
Leili Mosalanejad Iran
Dilek Avcı Türkiye
Yael Sela United States
Kyung‐Hee Lee South Korea
Havva Sert Türkiye
Nilgün Kuru Alıcı Türkiye
Anna Majda relative to Pei‐Lun Hsieh Taiwan Pei‐Lun Hsieh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Pei‐Lun Hsieh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Majda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Majda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Majda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Majda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Majda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Majda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Majda. The network helps show where Anna Majda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Majda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Majda Line = papers co-authored together Anna Majda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201667
2 202153
3 202249
4 201927
5 201921
6 202119
7 202116
8 202213
9 202013
10 201812
11
Health behaviour of students versus a sense of self-efficacy.
200712
12 202311
13 201910
14 20238
15 20237
16 20207
17 20197
18 20187
19 20156
20 20206

About Anna Majda

Anna Majda is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Social Sciences and Law, having authored 86 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Issues in Poland (13 papers), Health, Work, and Social Studies in Poland (13 papers), Polish Legal and Social Issues (12 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (9 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (9 papers), Nutrition and Health Studies (8 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (11 citations), Communication (51 citations), Leadership and Management (8 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations) and Clinical Psychology (84 citations). Anna Majda has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Greece and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Iwona Bodys-Cupak, Anna Kurowska, Krystian Barzykowski, Alicja Kamińska, Małgorzata Szkup, Artur Gądek, Henryk Liszka, Maria Kózka, Joanna Szklarczyk and Jolanta Jaworek. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMC Nursing, Nurse Education Today, PLoS ONE and Nursing Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact