Anna Maino

848 citations
27 papers · 538 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Maino

25 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Anna Maino
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Ophthalmology 282
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 209
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 31
  • Surgery 66
  • Neurology 18
Replace Pieter Gouws with:
Pieter Gouws United Kingdom
Matthew Gardiner United States
Iñaki Lekuona Goya Spain
Züleyha Yalnız-Akkaya Türkiye
J.L. Arné France
Achim Fieß Germany
Sılay Cantürk Uğurbaş Türkiye
Siddarth Rathi United States
Leyla Niyaz Türkiye
V. P. Sweeney Canada
Anna Maino relative to Pieter Gouws United Kingdom Pieter Gouws's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Pieter Gouws · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Maino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Maino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Maino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Maino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Maino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Maino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Maino. The network helps show where Anna Maino may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Maino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Maino Line = papers co-authored together Anna Maino links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005183
2 200860
3 200150
4 200035
5 200634
6 200019
7 200918
8 200515
9 200014
10 200113
11 200013
12 201011
13 20009
14 20069
15 20119
16 20097
17 20117
18 20007
19 20116
20 20104

About Anna Maino

Anna Maino is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (282 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (209 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (31 citations), Surgery (66 citations) and Neurology (18 citations). Anna Maino has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include B Leatherbarrow, David Devadason, Michele Vetrugno, Luigi Cardia, Felipe Dhawahir-Scala, Jane Ashworth, Susmito Biswas, Steven K. Charles, I. Christopher Lloyd and John P. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and European Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact