Anna Maino

856 citations
36 papers · 644 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Maino

31 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Anna Maino
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Ophthalmology 329
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 239
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 34
  • Epidemiology 62
  • Surgery 76
Replace Mei-Ying Lai with:
Mei-Ying Lai United States
Ronald J. Smith United States
Jan A. Kylstra United States
Sılay Cantürk Uğurbaş Türkiye
Achim Fieß Germany
Iñaki Lekuona Goya Spain
L P Noël Canada
W. F. I. SHEPHERD United Kingdom
Tunji Sunday Oluleye Nigeria
Marcelo Krieger Maestri Brazil
Anna Maino relative to Mei-Ying Lai United States Mei-Ying Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Mei-Ying Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Maino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Maino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Maino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Maino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Maino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Maino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Maino. The network helps show where Anna Maino may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Maino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Maino Line = papers co-authored together Anna Maino links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005192
2 200861
3 202152
4 200151
5 200037
6 200634
7 200021
8 200920
9 200518
10 200014
11 200014
12 202314
13 200114
14 201012
15 200612
16 200010
17 20119
18 20119
19 20098
20 20007

About Anna Maino

Anna Maino is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Health Informatics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 644 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (13 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (7 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (1 paper), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (1 paper) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (329 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (239 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (34 citations), Epidemiology (62 citations) and Surgery (76 citations). Anna Maino has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include David Devadason, Brian Leatherbarrow, Michele Vetrugno, Luigi Cardia, Felipe Dhawahir-Scala, Susmito Biswas, Steven K. Charles, Jane L. Ashworth, Andrew B. Tullo and Ian Christopher Lloyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Acta Ophthalmologica, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and Eye.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact