Anna M. Repice

21 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Anna M. Repice
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 354
  • Neurology 68
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 141
  • Hematology 41
  • Infectious Diseases 44
Replace Christian Jacobi with:
Christian Jacobi Germany
David J. Mock United States
Belinda Weller United Kingdom
Peter Wipfler Austria
Sushil M. Chandi India
Can Baykal Türkiye
J A Russell Canada
Ta‐Jen Lee Taiwan
Martin J. Donnelly Ireland
Hüdaver Alper Türkiye
Anna M. Repice relative to Christian Jacobi Germany Christian Jacobi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Christian Jacobi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Repice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Repice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Repice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Repice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Repice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Repice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Repice. The network helps show where Anna M. Repice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna M. Repice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna M. Repice Line = papers co-authored together Anna M. Repice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015200
2 1991169
3 1995148
4 202161
5 201440
6 202137
7 201530
8 202126
9 201823
10 202019
11 201816
12 201713
13 201212
14 199711
15
An attempt of identifying MS-associated loci as a follow-up of a genomic linkage study in the Italian population.
200011
16 200211
17 200311
18 20156
19 20246
20 20225

About Anna M. Repice

Anna M. Repice is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Health, Ophthalmology and Neurology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (13 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Social Media in Health Education (1 paper), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (1 paper) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (354 citations), Neurology (68 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (141 citations), Hematology (41 citations) and Infectious Diseases (44 citations). Anna M. Repice has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Adolfo Francesco Attili, Benedetta Nacmias, Sandro Sorbi, Silvia Piacentini, Paolo Forleo, Luigi A. Amaducci, Stefania Latorraca, Luca Massacesi, Simone Giannecchini and Alberta Azzi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroimmunology, Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, European Journal of Neurology, Neurology and Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact