Anna Kata

9 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Anna Kata's Hit Papers

Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement 2011 · 804 citations
8040+5+11Years since publication250500750

Peers

Anna Kata
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Health 1.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 951
  • Communication 133
  • Modeling and Simulation 71
  • Clinical Psychology 206
Replace Kellie E. Carlyle with:
Kellie E. Carlyle United States
Karen M. Hilyard United States
Frank Renkewitz Germany
Bao Sheng Loe United Kingdom
Kristen de Graaf South Africa
Alberto Giubilini United Kingdom
Sinéad Lambe United Kingdom
Neetu Suresh Abad United States
Lars Korn Germany
Daniel Jolley United Kingdom
Anna Kata relative to Kellie E. Carlyle United States Kellie E. Carlyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kellie E. Carlyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kata. The network helps show where Anna Kata may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Anna Kata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Kata Line = papers co-authored together Anna Kata links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet
Hit paper breakdown →
2009869
2
Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement
Hit paper breakdown →
2011804
3 2017135
4 2017133
5 201857
6 201644
7 201843
8 200928
9 20215

About Anna Kata

Anna Kata is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 9 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper) and Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (951 citations), Communication (133 citations), Modeling and Simulation (71 citations) and Clinical Psychology (206 citations). Anna Kata has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael H. Boyle, Katholiki Georgiades, Scott R. Colwell, Soyeon Kim, Mark Anthony Ferro, Peter Szatmari, Ryan J. Van Lieshout, Magdalena Janus, Laura Duncan and Ellen Louise Lipman. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Psychological Assessment, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact