Anna K. Wright

22 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Anna K. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Pharmacology 111
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 84
  • Biochemistry 28
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 14
  • Surgery 104
Replace Christian Dominik Peterlein with:
Christian Dominik Peterlein Germany
Paul L. Kuflik United States
Rabia Hamid Qureshi United States
Hiromichi Misawa Japan
R. Willburger Germany
Hamidreza Shemshaki Iran
Richard W. Easton United States
Anne Froholdt Norway
Bradley S. Duhon United States
Marie Nilsson Sweden
Anna K. Wright relative to Christian Dominik Peterlein Germany Christian Dominik Peterlein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Christian Dominik Peterlein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna K. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna K. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna K. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna K. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna K. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna K. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna K. Wright. The network helps show where Anna K. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna K. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna K. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Anna K. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199882
2 199977
3 201739
4 201833
5 201927
6 202122
7 201713
8 201913
9 201913
10 202212
11 201912
12 201912
13 202411
14 201910
15 20247
16 20197
17 20255
18 20204
19 20184
20 20174

About Anna K. Wright

Anna K. Wright is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biochemistry, Surgery, Neurology and Oncology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (111 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (84 citations), Biochemistry (28 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (14 citations) and Surgery (104 citations). Anna K. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Tom G. Mayer, Robert J. Gatchel, Jean‐Christophe Leveque, Rajiv K. Sethi, Vijay Yanamadala, Margaret J. McMahon, Alicia M. Edwards, Andrew S. Friedman, Farrokh R. Farrokhi and Quinlan D. Buchlak. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Spine Deformity, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, World Neurosurgery and PM&R.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact