Anna Jaeger

43 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Anna Jaeger
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Molecular Medicine 35
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
  • Endocrinology 33
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 42
  • Infectious Diseases 84
Replace Stacy G. Beal with:
Stacy G. Beal United States
Luminița Smaranda Iancu Romania
Sedigheh Rafiei Tabatabaei Iran
Wouter van den Bijllaardt Netherlands
Paola Nardini Italy
Iqbal Kaur India
Karen Rokkedal Lausch Denmark
Atul Kothari United States
Vijaya Lakshmi Nag India
Luana Nepomuceno Gondim Costa Lima Brazil
Anna Jaeger relative to Stacy G. Beal United States Stacy G. Beal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Stacy G. Beal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Jaeger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Jaeger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Jaeger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Jaeger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Jaeger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Jaeger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Jaeger. The network helps show where Anna Jaeger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Jaeger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Jaeger Line = papers co-authored together Anna Jaeger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199959
2 201938
3 201628
4 202023
5 202021
6 202020
7 202119
8 202018
9 201817
10 202316
11 202015
12 202014
13 202214
14 202213
15 201613
16 20219
17 20169
18 20228
19 20228
20 20237

About Anna Jaeger

Anna Jaeger is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 51 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (5 papers), Malaria Research and Control (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Vibrio bacteria research studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (35 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations), Endocrinology (33 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (42 citations) and Infectious Diseases (84 citations). Anna Jaeger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Ghana and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen May, Katharina Prieske, Linn Woelber, Denise Dekker, Ralf Krumkamp, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Charity Wiafe Akenten, Nancy Terreri, Bonita Stanton and Izabel Ricardo. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Annals of Oncology and Cancers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact