Anna Good
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Oncology top 10%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 7
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 2
- Co-authors
- Christian von Wagner (8 shared papers)Jane Wardle (6 shared papers)Charles Abraham (3 shared papers)Claudia Semmler (2 shared papers)Katriina L. Whitaker (2 shared papers)Austin Obichere (1 shared paper)Stuart Bloom (1 shared paper)Bernard Rachet (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research (2 papers)Journal of Cancer Survivorship (1 paper)Psychology and Health (1 paper)Epidemiologic Reviews (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Good
13 papers receiving 699 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Applied Psychology 160
- Oncology 341
- General Health Professions 265
- Health 73
- Literature and Literary Theory 59
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Good
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Good more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Good
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Good. The network helps show where Anna Good may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Anna Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 198 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 137 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 0 |
About Anna Good
Anna Good is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 14 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (160 citations), Oncology (341 citations), General Health Professions (265 citations), Health (73 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (59 citations). Anna Good has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christian von Wagner, Jane Wardle, Charles Abraham, Claudia Semmler, Katriina L. Whitaker, Austin Obichere, Stuart Bloom, Bernard Rachet, D. J. Wright and Peter R. Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Psychology and Health and Epidemiologic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.