Anna Conte

553 citations
34 papers · 334 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Conte

27 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Anna Conte
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • General Decision Sciences 172
  • Safety Research 108
  • Economics and Econometrics 157
  • Management Science and Operations Research 44
  • Applied Psychology 14
Replace Sabine Kröger with:
Sabine Kröger Canada
J. Todd Swarthout United States
Jonathan Brock United States
Sera Linardi United States
Kirsten I. M. Rohde Netherlands
Ranoua Bouchouicha United Kingdom
Dinky Daruvala Sweden
Sotiris Georganas United Kingdom
Oleg Korenok United States
Romel Mostafa United States
Anna Conte relative to Sabine Kröger Canada Sabine Kröger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Sabine Kröger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Conte. The network helps show where Anna Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Anna Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Conte Line = papers co-authored together Anna Conte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200998
2 201335
3 201632
4 201424
5 200819
6 200717
7 201216
8 201613
9 201310
10 20129
11 20138
12 20216
13 20196
14 20026
15 20185
16
Risk Aversion, Demographics and Unobserved Heterogeneity.Evidence from the Italian TV Show “Affari Tuoi”.
20065
17 20144
18 20234
19 20113
20 20153

About Anna Conte

Anna Conte is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Management Science and Operations Research and Accounting, having authored 34 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (18 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (4 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (172 citations), Safety Research (108 citations), Economics and Econometrics (157 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (44 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). Anna Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter G. Moffatt, John D. Hey, M. Vittoria Levati, Franz Buscha, Fabrizio Botti, Carlo D’Ippoliti, Marco Scarsini, Daniela Di Cagno, Fabrizio Maria Frattaroli and G Pappalardo. Their work appears in journals such as Theory and Decision, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Economica, Judgment and Decision Making and Economic Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact