Anna Cavender

1.0k citations
26 papers · 710 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Cavender

26 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Anna Cavender
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 216
  • Human-Computer Interaction 320
  • Occupational Therapy 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 285
  • Computer Science Applications 57
Replace Kathleen F. McCoy with:
Kathleen F. McCoy United States
Cole Gleason United States
Kelly Mack United States
Marina Buzzi Italy
Stephanie Ludi United States
Abigale Stangl United States
Danielle Bragg United States
Matt Huenerfauth United States
Hernisa Kacorri United States
Martez E. Mott United States
Anna Cavender relative to Kathleen F. McCoy United States Kathleen F. McCoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Kathleen F. McCoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Cavender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Cavender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Cavender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Cavender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Cavender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Cavender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Cavender. The network helps show where Anna Cavender may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Anna Cavender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Cavender Line = papers co-authored together Anna Cavender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007120
2 200999
3 200583
4 200963
5 200645
6 201539
7 200834
8 200333
9 201021
10 201021
11 200920
12 200820
13 200719
14 200815
15 200814
16 201111
17 200311
18 20089
19 20089
20 20098

About Anna Cavender

Anna Cavender is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (15 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (4 papers), Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (4 papers), Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (216 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (320 citations), Occupational Therapy (100 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (285 citations) and Computer Science Applications (57 citations). Anna Cavender has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey P. Bigham, Richard E. Ladner, Anthony J. Hornof, Vicki L. Hanson, Shari Trewin, Jeremy T. Brudvik, E.A. Riskin, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Mark R. Laff and Raja Kushalnagar. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, interactions, Universal Access in the Information Society, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing and ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact