Anna Barker

1.1k citations
40 papers · 752 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Barker

37 papers receiving 738 citations

Peers

Anna Barker
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 177
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 116
  • Infectious Diseases 395
  • Molecular Medicine 67
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 48
Replace Rune Aabenhus with:
Rune Aabenhus Denmark
Sameer Patel United States
Trevor Van Schooneveld United States
Jackson Musuuza United States
Anthony D. Bai Canada
Stephen Hughes United Kingdom
Lawrence Martinelli United States
Elizabeth Dodds Ashley United States
Christos Grigoras United States
Marie‐Reine Mallaret France
Anna Barker relative to Rune Aabenhus Denmark Rune Aabenhus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Rune Aabenhus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Barker. The network helps show where Anna Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Barker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Barker Line = papers co-authored together Anna Barker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201779
2 201774
3 201773
4 201662
5 201749
6 201742
7 201740
8 201839
9 201836
10 201725
11 202023
12 201718
13 202017
14 201416
15 202015
16 201713
17 201713
18 201711
19 201810
20 20189

About Anna Barker

Anna Barker is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Food Science, Epidemiology and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (20 papers), Infection Control in Healthcare (12 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (8 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (8 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (5 papers), Microscopic Colitis (5 papers) and Food Safety and Hygiene (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (177 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (116 citations), Infectious Diseases (395 citations), Molecular Medicine (67 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (48 citations). Anna Barker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Nasia Safdar, Sharmila Sengupta, Kelli McCormack Brown, Jackson Musuuza, Oğuzhan Alagöz, Megan Duster, Timothy Hess, Shoshannah Eggers, Jessica S Tischendorf and Laurie Archbald‐Pannone. Their work appears in journals such as Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, American Journal of Infection Control, BMJ Open, Contemporary Clinical Trials and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact