Anna Badner

20 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Anna Badner
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Developmental Neuroscience 71
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 275
  • Genetics 99
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 163
  • Neurology 42
Replace Jonathon Chon Teng Chio with:
Jonathon Chon Teng Chio Canada
Chuanming Dong China
Masaya Nakamura Japan
Nicole Forgione Canada
Dearbhaile Dooley Ireland
Michael B. Orr United States
Daniel J. Hellenbrand United States
Ahad M. Siddiqui United States
Syoichi Tashiro Japan
Junkui Shang China
Anna Badner relative to Jonathon Chon Teng Chio Canada Jonathon Chon Teng Chio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jonathon Chon Teng Chio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Badner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Badner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Badner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Badner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Badner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Badner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Badner. The network helps show where Anna Badner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Badner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Badner Line = papers co-authored together Anna Badner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202065
2 201755
3 201653
4 201950
5 201447
6 201535
7 201832
8 201920
9 201817
10 202114
11 201514
12 202011
13 20199
14 20208
15 20218
16 20226
17 20225
18 20155
19 20234
20
The effect of animal weight on over ground locomotion in neurological diseases with a focus in CatWalk gait assessment.
20181

About Anna Badner

Anna Badner is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Genetics, Developmental Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (15 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (71 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (275 citations), Genetics (99 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (163 citations) and Neurology (42 citations). Anna Badner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Fehlings, James Hong, Reaz Vawda, Ahad M. Siddiqui, Jonathon Chon Teng Chio, Mirriam Mikhail, Marc Soubeyrand, Young Sun Chung, Jian Wang and Pía M. Vidal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, Stem Cells Translational Medicine, Journal of Neuroinflammation, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Science Translational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact