Anna Badner

22 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Anna Badner
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Developmental Neuroscience 92
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 320
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 201
  • Genetics 105
  • Neurology 55
Replace Daniel J. Hellenbrand with:
Daniel J. Hellenbrand United States
Syoichi Tashiro Japan
Masaya Nakamura Japan
Mark A. Oatway Canada
Stephanie Hawbecker United States
Paweł Tabakow Poland
James W. Rowland Canada
Maneesh Sen Garg United States
Marc E. Eichler United States
Francisco D. Benavides United States
Anna Badner relative to Daniel J. Hellenbrand United States Daniel J. Hellenbrand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Daniel J. Hellenbrand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Badner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Badner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Badner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Badner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Badner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Badner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Badner. The network helps show where Anna Badner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Badner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Badner Line = papers co-authored together Anna Badner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201782
2 202077
3 201659
4 201759
5 201956
6 201448
7 201541
8 201836
9 202330
10 201925
11 201819
12 202117
13 201514
14 202012
15 202110
16 202010
17 20199
18 20227
19 20236
20 20156

About Anna Badner

Anna Badner is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Genetics, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (13 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (4 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (92 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (320 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (201 citations), Genetics (105 citations) and Neurology (55 citations). Anna Badner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael George Fehlings, Antigona Ulndreaj, James Hong, Reaz Vawda, Ahad M. Siddiqui, Jonathon Chon Teng Chio, Mirriam Mikhail, Marc Soubeyrand, Young Sun Chung and Pia Maria Vidal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, Journal of Neuroinflammation, Stem Cells Translational Medicine, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Science Translational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact