Anna Anselmo

2.5k citations
34 papers · 583 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Anselmo

31 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Anna Anselmo
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Molecular Medicine 100
  • Microbiology 65
  • Endocrinology 51
  • Infectious Diseases 136
  • Animal Science and Zoology 78
Replace Peter L. Sadowski with:
Peter L. Sadowski United States
Victoria Furió Spain
Peng Ma China
Roger D. Pechous United States
W Scharmann Germany
Nicola Palmieri Austria
Giuseppina Mariano United Kingdom
Harriet Dashnow Australia
Dominik M. Meinel Germany
Maria Desmidt Belgium
Anna Anselmo relative to Peter L. Sadowski United States Peter L. Sadowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×63×
Peter L. Sadowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Anselmo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Anselmo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Anselmo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Anselmo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Anselmo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Anselmo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Anselmo. The network helps show where Anna Anselmo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Anselmo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Anselmo Line = papers co-authored together Anna Anselmo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202097
2 201966
3 201752
4 201442
5 201739
6 200836
7 201136
8 201330
9 200627
10 201523
11 201620
12 202015
13 201715
14 202014
15 202111
16 20198
17 20167
18 20196
19 20195
20 20105

About Anna Anselmo

Anna Anselmo is a scholar working on Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (8 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (5 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (4 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (100 citations), Microbiology (65 citations), Endocrinology (51 citations), Infectious Diseases (136 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (78 citations). Anna Anselmo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Fillo, Andrea Ciammaruconi, Antonella Fortunato, Florigio Lista, Bouabid Badaoui, Sara Botti, Elisabetta Giuffra, Paola Stefanelli, Florigio Lista and Maria Rita Gismondo. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Infectious Diseases, BMC Genomics, Infection Genetics and Evolution and Microbial Drug Resistance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact