Ann Spriet

2.1k citations
70 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Ann Spriet

69 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ann Spriet
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Signal Processing 1.2k
  • Computational Mechanics 986
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 604
  • Speech and Hearing 109
  • Biomedical Engineering 341
Replace Henning Puder with:
Henning Puder Germany
Chengshi Zheng China
Henning Schepker Germany
Prasanga N. Samarasinghe Australia
S.M. Kuo United States
Felipe Orduña-Bustamante Mexico
Yutaka Kaneda Japan
Archontis Politis Finland
Gerhard Stoll United Kingdom
Yusuke Hioka New Zealand
Ann Spriet relative to Henning Puder Germany Henning Puder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Henning Puder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Spriet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Spriet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Spriet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Spriet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Spriet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Spriet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Spriet. The network helps show where Ann Spriet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann Spriet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Spriet Line = papers co-authored together Ann Spriet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005152
2 2007146
3 2007125
4 2004122
5 2010104
6 200690
7 200770
8 200554
9 200553
10 201241
11 201031
12 202227
13 202125
14 200924
15 200723
16 200522
17 200520
18 200218
19
Evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing instruments
200817
20
Objective measures for real-time evaluation of adaptive feedback cancellation algorithms in hearing aids
200817

About Ann Spriet

Ann Spriet is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computational Mechanics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and Audio Processing (46 papers), Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques (38 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (26 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (16 papers), Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques (8 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (6 papers), Control Systems and Identification (3 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (1.2k citations), Computational Mechanics (986 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (604 citations), Speech and Hearing (109 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (341 citations). Ann Spriet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Marc Moonen, Jan Wouters, Simon Doclo, Ian K. Proudler, Geert Rombouts, Astrid Van Wieringen, Lieselot Van Deun, Nilesh Madhu, Johan Laneau and Bas van Dijk. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Signal Processing, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing and European Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact